I got sick of the social media and people running them like Zuckerberg and I am no longer supporting these people with my money or presence. I cancelled Amazon Prime, Kindle unlimited, audible, I no longer participate in Facebook, Twitter, Reddit or similar. I only support independent media like Axios, Substack. or Medium.
When Bezos laid almost 30,000 workers but supported Melanoma’s worthless movie with ~$45 million (for rights and creation) and ~$30 million in advertising, I had have enough. I think Americans must start to use their purchasing power to “vote” billionaires out. I stopped supporting the Humane society as soon as I learned that they hosted a fury party in a Mar-a-Lago, and I stopped using Amazon services as much as possible too.
Reason 1 – moral view
An author on Media, Citizen Reader, wrote about Bezos:
“He’s got no money to pay his reporters in warzones, but he’s got $40 million to pay for the rights to the “Melania’s” documentary, and $35 million to advertise it;”
Reason 2 – financial view
The lack of morality was enough for me to spend money on Amazon. But I also reviewed my spending habit on Amazon and this is what I found:
1) Amazon Prime
Typical cost:
- ~$139/year (~$11.60/month)
What I get:
- Free shipping
- Prime Video (basic tier)
- Prime Music (limited)
- Random perks (photos, deals, etc.)
Reality check:
- If I order often and value fast shipping – Prime pays for itself
- If orders are sporadic – shipping savings often don’t justify the fee
2) Prime Video
Hidden issue:
- A LOT of content is paid add-ons now
- You still end up renting/buying movies
Reality check:
- If you already use Netflix / Apple TV / YouTube – Prime Video is usually redundant. (I don’t use Netflix/Apple TV either, I still use YouTube, though).
- Very few people watch it intentionally
3) Kindle Unlimited
Typical cost:
- ~$12/month
Reality check:
- Excellent if you read genre fiction heavily
- Terrible if you read specific books, non-fiction, or classics
- Most high-quality books are NOT included
For someone like me (analytical, selective reader): Often poor value
4) Audible
Typical cost:
- ~$15/month (1 credit)
Reality check:
- Credits accumulate – psychological trap
- You often buy books “because you have credits,” not because you need them
- Libraries + Libby often replace this at $0
I spent ~$650/year on all sorts of Amazon services I rarely used:
My Amazon order frequency (hard data)
I made the following purchase orders per year:
- 2025: 18 orders
- 2024: 28 orders
- 2023: 20 orders
- 2022: 3 orders
- 2021: 13 orders
- 2020: 14 orders
Let’s focus on recent behavior, because that’s what matters.
Average (last 3 full years: 2023-2025):
- (20 + 28 + 18) / 3 = 22 orders/year
- That’s ~1.8 orders/month
Cost of Amazon Prime
- $139/year
- Break-even logic:
If Prime saves:
- ~$6-7 per shipment (typical non-Prime shipping)
Then:
- $139 / $6 = 23 shipments
- $139 / $7 = 20 shipments
My actual usage (~22/year) is right at break-even.
So strictly financially:
- Prime is not clearly winning
- It’s not clearly losing
- It’s marginal at best
With this behavior, I have a zero reason keeping Amazon Prime, spend ~$130 a year and support a billionaire who doesn’t give a shit about people. More over my shopping behavior was not urgent driven. It usually was intentional and planned. I was not buying because “oh crap, I need this tomorrow.”
Prime does one thing extremely well – it removes the pause between “want” and “buy.” And I read some responses under the Citizen Reader’s post about one person cancelling Amazon Prime and feeling worse. His life got worse and his cancellation made no difference. It is a trap billionaires want you in it. But Prime got very addictive. The convenience of one click and same day delivery shopping is very addictive and it changes people’s behavior. By cancelling Prime, you are effectively de-coupling convenience from compulsion which is the trap Bezos wants you in. So cancelling Prime is not about making a significant change in today’s economy, you will not make effect that happens tomorrow, but you will improve your behavior, save money
Facebook, Twitter (X), and Reddit – gone
I cut Facebook years ago. It was a toxic platform spinning lies, propaganda, and outrage. If you are a right-wing extremist or MAGA, you may love it. To me, it became a machine that amplified everything I consider destructive misinformation, division, and censorship.
But Facebook wasn’t the only problem. Over time, I noticed the same pattern spreading across platforms like Reddit and X (Twitter). Different branding, same underlying mechanics: engagement at any cost.
At first, I thought I could manage it. Use it “responsibly.” Stay informed. Maybe even have meaningful discussions.
That illusion didn’t last.
Sugarberg (Zuckerberg) got repulsive
Overtime, this billionaire got extremely repulsive to me. When he was investing in his company, growing it, coming with ideas, and what seemed like revolutionizing media (democratizing it), I was hooked. We could express ourselves, it was a better platform than this block that almost no one reads and I felt like I could help others trading and investing better by sharing my experience there than here.
Then 2018 came and the Cambridge Analytica scandal came. Third-party apps collected private data from users (Facebook is still sued in Europe over private data handling, along with X (Twitter)), Facebook was able to collect data from your profile friends and followers, data then passed to Cambridge Analytica for analyzing and then targeting and politically profiling users. Back then $87 million users were affected (I was safe to a certain level as I used a nickname and toss-out email and never posted any private information about me, though there may have been external leads to public web where you can find almost anything about me you want, so I guess, I was not that much safe).
But this annoyed me to a certain level but I shrugged it off.
Then Metaverse came. A huge waste of money. Our money. Money these people make from us, from our advertising, use of their services. That’s when I started realizing that Facebook is personally worthless to me, wasting my time, my money, and the Alien-executive-officer is repulsive:
Yet, he got away with it!
The Real Cost: Stress, Anger, and Addiction
The biggest issue wasn’t politics. It wasn’t even misinformation.
It was what these platforms were doing to me.
There were days when I woke up, grabbed my phone, and immediately checked Facebook or Reddit. Within minutes, I was already irritated. Angry. Pulled into arguments about things I couldn’t control. My day would start with frustration instead of focus.
Think about that for a second.
Why would I willingly start my day by reading someone else’s opinion, often taken out of context, exaggerated, or outright false, and let it dictate my mood? Why would I spend time arguing with strangers who:
- Don’t know me
- Don’t care about the truth
- Are often more interested in “winning” than understanding
It makes no sense. Yet that’s exactly what these platforms are engineered to do.
Designed to Hook You, Not Help You
Social media isn’t neutral. It’s not just a tool.
It’s a system designed to:
- Maximize your time on the platform
- Trigger emotional reactions
- Keep you coming back
Outrage performs better than nuance. Conflict drives engagement. Fear and anger keep you scrolling. So that’s what you get more of.
Over time, you’re not just consuming content, you’re being conditioned:
- Shorter attention span
- Higher reactivity
- Lower tolerance for opposing views
- Constant background stress
And the worst part? It feels normal.
The Breaking Point
For me, it wasn’t one event. It was accumulation. Repeated account blocks on Reddit for sarcasm or jokes. Endless circular arguments. The realization that no matter how much time I spent, nothing improved, neither my knowledge nor the world around me. Just more noise. At some point, I had to ask: “What am I actually getting out of this?” The answer was simple: nothing of value.
I asked myself one question:
Compare billionaires like Bezos, or Sugarberg to Warren Buffett. He is not bombastic, lavish spending, politically involved, yet he is a billionaire. Or Dan Price! He is also rich yet he raised salaries to his employees to 70k a year no matter what position. It was outrageous. Yet it works (I admit, I was against it, too, as it defied any logic of merit, but the company survived. So how come some billionaires are humble and contribute to the society and others become total jerks?
The short answer is: wealth doesn’t make people jerks; it removes constraints. What emerges depends on what replaces those constraints. People like Warren Buffett or Dan Price preserved their moral constraints, they kept their external anchors after becoming rich such as:
Warren Buffett’s anchors:
- Reputation as an allocator of capital
- Long-term credibility
- Moral consistency (even when unpopular)
- A peer group that values restraint and stewardship
Money never became his identity – judgment did.
Dan Price’s anchors:
- Internal coherence (“I must be able to justify this to myself”)
- Direct proximity to employees
- Willingness to absorb ridicule
- Acceptance that not all value is measured short-term
His move did defy orthodox merit logic, and it felt right to have been skeptical, but it worked because:
- Trust became a productivity multiplier
- Turnover collapsed
- Institutional knowledge compounded
- Employees behaved like owners
The key point: both men constrained themselves voluntarily.
Compare it to other billionaires who:
- Outgrew the customers
- Outgrew their employees
- Outgrew local communities
- Outgrew consequences
At massive scale, incentives shift from “build something valuable” to “Protect position, access, and optionality.” Then we see” political hedging, prestige spending, narrative control, and labor is treated as a cost, not a constituency. Buffett still answers to markets, shareholders and his own reputation, Bezos doesn’t give a shit. He doesn’t respond to anyone. These people removed any constraints, confused scale with virtue, mistake survival for superiority and they stepped needing consent. Humility doesn’t come from wealth. It still being answerable to something you can’t buy. Buffett kept that, Price chose it deliberately, other didn’t, they actively dismantled it. And I chose not to be a part of that and support it with my only leverage I have – wallet and participation. Choosing not to auto-fund that, mainly when it costs nothing, is a moral standing for me.
Today, I feel better. I saved a good junk of money which every year, I will grab that and invest instead of paying to Bezos, and I also feel like I am doing my part not supporting the people like Bezos or Zuckerberg.
|
We all want to hear your opinion on the article above: No Comments |


































Recent Comments